/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KILLED proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF). (0) CpxIntTrs (1) Loat Proof [FINISHED, 116 ms] (2) BOUNDS(1, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: l0(A, B, C, D, E, F) -> Com_1(l1(A, B, C, D, E, F)) :|: TRUE l1(A, B, C, D, E, F) -> Com_1(l1(A + B, B + C, C + D, D + E, E + F, F - 1)) :|: A >= 1 The start-symbols are:[l0_6] ---------------------------------------- (1) Loat Proof (FINISHED) ### Pre-processing the ITS problem ### Initial linear ITS problem Start location: l0 0: l0 -> l1 : [], cost: 1 1: l1 -> l1 : A'=A+B, B'=C+B, C'=C+D, D'=D+E, E'=F+E, F'=-1+F, [ A>=1 ], cost: 1 Checking for constant complexity: The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity: 0: l0 -> l1 : [], cost: 1 ### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ### Accelerating simple loops of location 1. Accelerating the following rules: 1: l1 -> l1 : A'=A+B, B'=C+B, C'=C+D, D'=D+E, E'=F+E, F'=-1+F, [ A>=1 ], cost: 1 Found no metering function for rule 1. Removing the simple loops:. Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible): Start location: l0 0: l0 -> l1 : [], cost: 1 1: l1 -> l1 : A'=A+B, B'=C+B, C'=C+D, D'=D+E, E'=F+E, F'=-1+F, [ A>=1 ], cost: 1 Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules): Start location: l0 0: l0 -> l1 : [], cost: 1 2: l0 -> l1 : A'=A+B, B'=C+B, C'=C+D, D'=D+E, E'=F+E, F'=-1+F, [ A>=1 ], cost: 2 Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost): Start location: l0 ### Computing asymptotic complexity ### Fully simplified ITS problem Start location: l0 Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n): Complexity: Constant Cpx degree: 0 Solved cost: 1 Rule cost: 1 Rule guard: [] WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?) ---------------------------------------- (2) BOUNDS(1, INF)