/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WORST_CASE(?, O(n^1))
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat
# AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty


The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, max(1, 101 + -1 * Arg_0)).

(0) CpxIntTrs
(1) Koat2 Proof [FINISHED, 432 ms]
(2) BOUNDS(1, max(1, 101 + -1 * Arg_0))


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules:
l0(A) -> Com_1(l1(A)) :|: TRUE
l1(A) -> Com_1(l1(A + A + 10)) :|: A >= 1 && A <= 99

The start-symbols are:[l0_1]


----------------------------------------

(1) Koat2 Proof (FINISHED)
YES( ?, max([1, 101-Arg_0]) {O(n)})



Initial Complexity Problem:

  Start:  l0  

  Program_Vars:  Arg_0  

  Temp_Vars:    

  Locations:  l0, l1  

  Transitions:

  0: l0->l1

  1: l1->l1  



Timebounds: 

  Overall timebound: max([1, 101-Arg_0]) {O(n)}

  0: l0->l1: 1 {O(1)}

  1: l1->l1: max([0, 100-Arg_0]) {O(n)}



Costbounds:

  Overall costbound: max([1, 101-Arg_0]) {O(n)}

  0: l0->l1: 1 {O(1)}

  1: l1->l1: max([0, 100-Arg_0]) {O(n)}



Sizebounds:

`Lower:

  0: l0->l1, Arg_0: Arg_0 {O(n)}

  1: l1->l1, Arg_0: 12 {O(1)}

`Upper:

  0: l0->l1, Arg_0: Arg_0 {O(n)}

  1: l1->l1, Arg_0: 208 {O(1)}


----------------------------------------

(2)
BOUNDS(1, max(1, 101 + -1 * Arg_0))