/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?)
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat
# AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty


The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF).

(0) CpxIntTrs
(1) Loat Proof [FINISHED, 216 ms]
(2) BOUNDS(INF, INF)


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules:
f300(A) -> Com_1(f3(A)) :|: TRUE
f3(A) -> Com_1(f3(-(1) + A)) :|: 0 >= A
f3(A) -> Com_1(f3(-(1) + A)) :|: A >= 1

The start-symbols are:[f300_1]


----------------------------------------

(1) Loat Proof (FINISHED)


### Pre-processing the ITS problem ###



Initial linear ITS problem

   Start location: f300

      0: f300 -> f3 : [], cost: 1

      1: f3 -> f3 : A'=-1+A, [ 0>=A ], cost: 1

      2: f3 -> f3 : A'=-1+A, [ A>=1 ], cost: 1



Checking for constant complexity:

   The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity:

      0: f300 -> f3 : [], cost: 1



### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ###



Accelerating simple loops of location 1.

   Accelerating the following rules:

      1: f3 -> f3 : A'=-1+A, [ 0>=A ], cost: 1

      2: f3 -> f3 : A'=-1+A, [ A>=1 ], cost: 1



   Accelerated rule 1 with NONTERM, yielding the new rule 3.

   Accelerated rule 2 with metering function A, yielding the new rule 4.

   Removing the simple loops: 1 2.



Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible):

   Start location: f300

      0: f300 -> f3 : [], cost: 1

      3: f3 -> [2] : [ 0>=A ], cost: NONTERM

      4: f3 -> f3 : A'=0, [ A>=1 ], cost: A



Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules):

   Start location: f300

      0: f300 -> f3 : [], cost: 1

      5: f300 -> [2] : [ 0>=A ], cost: NONTERM

      6: f300 -> f3 : A'=0, [ A>=1 ], cost: 1+A



Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost):

   Start location: f300

      5: f300 -> [2] : [ 0>=A ], cost: NONTERM

      6: f300 -> f3 : A'=0, [ A>=1 ], cost: 1+A



### Computing asymptotic complexity ###



Fully simplified ITS problem

   Start location: f300

      5: f300 -> [2] : [ 0>=A ], cost: NONTERM

      6: f300 -> f3 : A'=0, [ A>=1 ], cost: 1+A



Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 5

   Guard is satisfiable, yielding nontermination

   Resulting cost NONTERM has complexity: Nonterm



Found new complexity Nonterm.



Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n):

   Complexity:  Nonterm

   Cpx degree:  Nonterm

   Solved cost: NONTERM

   Rule cost:   NONTERM

   Rule guard:  [ 0>=A ]



NO


----------------------------------------

(2)
BOUNDS(INF, INF)