/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: c69e44bd14796315568835c1ffa2502984884775 mhark 20210624 unpublished Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 105 ms] (2) QTRS (3) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) QTRS (5) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(X) -> cons(X, n__f(g(X))) g(0) -> s(0) g(s(X)) -> s(s(g(X))) sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> X sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z)) f(X) -> n__f(X) activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X) activate(X) -> X Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: f/1(YES) cons/2(YES,YES) n__f/1)YES( g/1(YES) 0/0) s/1(YES) sel/2(YES,YES) activate/1(YES) Quasi precedence: sel_2 > [f_1, activate_1] > g_1 > 0 > cons_2 sel_2 > [f_1, activate_1] > g_1 > s_1 > cons_2 Status: f_1: multiset status cons_2: multiset status g_1: multiset status 0: multiset status s_1: multiset status sel_2: [1,2] activate_1: multiset status With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: f(X) -> cons(X, n__f(g(X))) g(0) -> s(0) g(s(X)) -> s(s(g(X))) sel(0, cons(X, Y)) -> X sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z)) f(X) -> n__f(X) activate(X) -> X ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Quasi precedence: n__f_1 > [activate_1, f_1] Status: activate_1: multiset status n__f_1: multiset status f_1: multiset status With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X) ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: R is empty. Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (5) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (6) YES