/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


YES

** BEGIN proof argument **
All the DP problems were proved finite.
As all the involved DP processors are sound,
the TRS under analysis terminates.
** END proof argument **

** BEGIN proof description **
## Searching for a generalized rewrite rule
(a rule whose right-hand side contains a variable
that does not occur in the left-hand side)...
No generalized rewrite rule found!

## Applying the DP framework...
## 2 initial DP problems to solve.
## First, we try to decompose these problems into smaller problems.
## Round 1 [2 DP problems]:
  ## DP problem:
  Dependency pairs = [x^#(_0,s(_1)) -> x^#(_0,_1)]
  TRS = {and(tt,_0) -> activate(_0), plus(_0,0) -> _0, plus(_0,s(_1)) -> s(plus(_0,_1)), x(_0,0) -> 0, x(_0,s(_1)) -> plus(x(_0,_1),_0), activate(_0) -> _0}
    ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Success!
  This DP problem is finite.
  ## DP problem:
  Dependency pairs = [plus^#(_0,s(_1)) -> plus^#(_0,_1)]
  TRS = {and(tt,_0) -> activate(_0), plus(_0,0) -> _0, plus(_0,s(_1)) -> s(plus(_0,_1)), x(_0,0) -> 0, x(_0,s(_1)) -> plus(x(_0,_1),_0), activate(_0) -> _0}
    ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Success!
  This DP problem is finite.
## All the DP problems were proved finite.
As all the involved DP processors are sound,
the TRS under analysis terminates.
Proof run on Linux version 3.10.0-1160.25.1.el7.x86_64 for amd64
using Java version 1.8.0_292
** END proof description **
Total number of generated unfolded rules = 0