/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES ** BEGIN proof argument ** All the DP problems were proved finite. As all the involved DP processors are sound, the TRS under analysis terminates. ** END proof argument ** ** BEGIN proof description ** ## Searching for a generalized rewrite rule (a rule whose right-hand side contains a variable that does not occur in the left-hand side)... No generalized rewrite rule found! ## Applying the DP framework... ## 1 initial DP problem to solve. ## First, we try to decompose this problem into smaller problems. ## Round 1 [1 DP problem]: ## DP problem: Dependency pairs = [not^#(or(_0,_1)) -> not^#(not(not(_0))), not^#(or(_0,_1)) -> not^#(not(_0)), not^#(or(_0,_1)) -> not^#(_0), not^#(or(_0,_1)) -> not^#(not(not(_1))), not^#(or(_0,_1)) -> not^#(not(_1)), not^#(or(_0,_1)) -> not^#(_1), not^#(and(_0,_1)) -> not^#(not(not(_0))), not^#(and(_0,_1)) -> not^#(not(_0)), not^#(and(_0,_1)) -> not^#(_0), not^#(and(_0,_1)) -> not^#(not(not(_1))), not^#(and(_0,_1)) -> not^#(not(_1)), not^#(and(_0,_1)) -> not^#(_1)] TRS = {not(not(_0)) -> _0, not(or(_0,_1)) -> and(not(not(not(_0))),not(not(not(_1)))), not(and(_0,_1)) -> or(not(not(not(_0))),not(not(not(_1))))} ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Failed! ## Trying with polynomial interpretations... The constraints are satisfied by the polynomials: {or(_0,_1):[_0 * _1], and(_0,_1):[_0 * _1], not(_0):[_0], not^#(_0):[_0]} for all instantiations of the variables with values greater than or equal to mu = 2. This DP problem is finite. ## All the DP problems were proved finite. As all the involved DP processors are sound, the TRS under analysis terminates. Proof run on Linux version 3.10.0-1160.25.1.el7.x86_64 for amd64 using Java version 1.8.0_292 ** END proof description ** Total number of generated unfolded rules = 0