/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES ** BEGIN proof argument ** All the DP problems were proved finite. As all the involved DP processors are sound, the TRS under analysis terminates. ** END proof argument ** ** BEGIN proof description ** ## Searching for a generalized rewrite rule (a rule whose right-hand side contains a variable that does not occur in the left-hand side)... No generalized rewrite rule found! ## Applying the DP framework... ## 2 initial DP problems to solve. ## First, we try to decompose these problems into smaller problems. ## Round 1 [2 DP problems]: ## DP problem: Dependency pairs = [lessleaves^#(cons(_0,_1),cons(_2,_3)) -> lessleaves^#(concat(_0,_1),concat(_2,_3))] TRS = {concat(leaf,_0) -> _0, concat(cons(_0,_1),_2) -> cons(_0,concat(_1,_2)), lessleaves(_0,leaf) -> false, lessleaves(leaf,cons(_0,_1)) -> true, lessleaves(cons(_0,_1),cons(_2,_3)) -> lessleaves(concat(_0,_1),concat(_2,_3))} ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Failed! ## Trying with polynomial interpretations... This DP problem is too complex! Aborting! ## Trying with lexicographic path orders... Failed! ## Trying with Knuth-Bendix orders... The constraints are satisfied by the Knuth-Bendix order using the precedence: concat > [cons] and the weight function: {variables:1, cons:1, lessleaves:0, true:1, leaf:1, concat:0, false:1, lessleaves^#:0} This DP problem is finite. ## DP problem: Dependency pairs = [concat^#(cons(_0,_1),_2) -> concat^#(_1,_2)] TRS = {concat(leaf,_0) -> _0, concat(cons(_0,_1),_2) -> cons(_0,concat(_1,_2)), lessleaves(_0,leaf) -> false, lessleaves(leaf,cons(_0,_1)) -> true, lessleaves(cons(_0,_1),cons(_2,_3)) -> lessleaves(concat(_0,_1),concat(_2,_3))} ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Success! This DP problem is finite. ## All the DP problems were proved finite. As all the involved DP processors are sound, the TRS under analysis terminates. Proof run on Linux version 3.10.0-1160.25.1.el7.x86_64 for amd64 using Java version 1.8.0_292 ** END proof description ** Total number of generated unfolded rules = 0