/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES Problem 1: (VAR v_NonEmpty:S u:S v:S x:S y:S z:S) (RULES admit(x:S,.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,z:S)))) -> cond(=(sum(x:S,u:S,v:S),w),.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,admit(carry(x:S,u:S,v:S),z:S))))) admit(x:S,nil) -> nil cond(ttrue,y:S) -> y:S ) Problem 1: Innermost Equivalent Processor: -> Rules: admit(x:S,.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,z:S)))) -> cond(=(sum(x:S,u:S,v:S),w),.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,admit(carry(x:S,u:S,v:S),z:S))))) admit(x:S,nil) -> nil cond(ttrue,y:S) -> y:S -> The term rewriting system is non-overlaping or locally confluent overlay system. Therefore, innermost termination implies termination. Problem 1: Dependency Pairs Processor: -> Pairs: ADMIT(x:S,.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,z:S)))) -> ADMIT(carry(x:S,u:S,v:S),z:S) ADMIT(x:S,.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,z:S)))) -> COND(=(sum(x:S,u:S,v:S),w),.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,admit(carry(x:S,u:S,v:S),z:S))))) -> Rules: admit(x:S,.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,z:S)))) -> cond(=(sum(x:S,u:S,v:S),w),.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,admit(carry(x:S,u:S,v:S),z:S))))) admit(x:S,nil) -> nil cond(ttrue,y:S) -> y:S Problem 1: SCC Processor: -> Pairs: ADMIT(x:S,.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,z:S)))) -> ADMIT(carry(x:S,u:S,v:S),z:S) ADMIT(x:S,.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,z:S)))) -> COND(=(sum(x:S,u:S,v:S),w),.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,admit(carry(x:S,u:S,v:S),z:S))))) -> Rules: admit(x:S,.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,z:S)))) -> cond(=(sum(x:S,u:S,v:S),w),.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,admit(carry(x:S,u:S,v:S),z:S))))) admit(x:S,nil) -> nil cond(ttrue,y:S) -> y:S ->Strongly Connected Components: ->->Cycle: ->->-> Pairs: ADMIT(x:S,.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,z:S)))) -> ADMIT(carry(x:S,u:S,v:S),z:S) ->->-> Rules: admit(x:S,.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,z:S)))) -> cond(=(sum(x:S,u:S,v:S),w),.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,admit(carry(x:S,u:S,v:S),z:S))))) admit(x:S,nil) -> nil cond(ttrue,y:S) -> y:S Problem 1: Subterm Processor: -> Pairs: ADMIT(x:S,.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,z:S)))) -> ADMIT(carry(x:S,u:S,v:S),z:S) -> Rules: admit(x:S,.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,z:S)))) -> cond(=(sum(x:S,u:S,v:S),w),.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,admit(carry(x:S,u:S,v:S),z:S))))) admit(x:S,nil) -> nil cond(ttrue,y:S) -> y:S ->Projection: pi(ADMIT) = 2 Problem 1: SCC Processor: -> Pairs: Empty -> Rules: admit(x:S,.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,z:S)))) -> cond(=(sum(x:S,u:S,v:S),w),.(u:S,.(v:S,.(w,admit(carry(x:S,u:S,v:S),z:S))))) admit(x:S,nil) -> nil cond(ttrue,y:S) -> y:S ->Strongly Connected Components: There is no strongly connected component The problem is finite.