/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES ** BEGIN proof argument ** All the DP problems were proved finite. As all the involved DP processors are sound, the TRS under analysis terminates. ** END proof argument ** ** BEGIN proof description ** ## Searching for a generalized rewrite rule (a rule whose right-hand side contains a variable that does not occur in the left-hand side)... No generalized rewrite rule found! ## Applying the DP framework... ## 3 initial DP problems to solve. ## First, we try to decompose these problems into smaller problems. ## Round 1 [3 DP problems]: ## DP problem: Dependency pairs = [f^#(+(_0,_1),_2) -> f^#(_0,_2), f^#(+(_0,_1),_2) -> f^#(_1,_2)] TRS = {+(a,b) -> +(b,a), +(a,+(b,_0)) -> +(b,+(a,_0)), +(+(_0,_1),_2) -> +(_0,+(_1,_2)), f(a,_0) -> a, f(b,_0) -> b, f(+(_0,_1),_2) -> +(f(_0,_2),f(_1,_2))} ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Success! This DP problem is finite. ## DP problem: Dependency pairs = [+^#(+(_0,_1),_2) -> +^#(_0,+(_1,_2)), +^#(+(_0,_1),_2) -> +^#(_1,_2)] TRS = {+(a,b) -> +(b,a), +(a,+(b,_0)) -> +(b,+(a,_0)), +(+(_0,_1),_2) -> +(_0,+(_1,_2)), f(a,_0) -> a, f(b,_0) -> b, f(+(_0,_1),_2) -> +(f(_0,_2),f(_1,_2))} ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Failed! ## Trying with polynomial interpretations... The constraints are satisfied by the polynomials: {a:[0], f(_0,_1):[_0 + _1 + _0 * _1], b:[0], +(_0,_1):[1 + _0 + _1], +^#(_0,_1):[_0]} for all instantiations of the variables with values greater than or equal to mu = 0. This DP problem is finite. ## DP problem: Dependency pairs = [+^#(a,+(b,_0)) -> +^#(a,_0)] TRS = {+(a,b) -> +(b,a), +(a,+(b,_0)) -> +(b,+(a,_0)), +(+(_0,_1),_2) -> +(_0,+(_1,_2)), f(a,_0) -> a, f(b,_0) -> b, f(+(_0,_1),_2) -> +(f(_0,_2),f(_1,_2))} ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Success! This DP problem is finite. ## All the DP problems were proved finite. As all the involved DP processors are sound, the TRS under analysis terminates. Proof run on Linux version 3.10.0-1160.25.1.el7.x86_64 for amd64 using Java version 1.8.0_292 ** END proof description ** Total number of generated unfolded rules = 0