/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: c69e44bd14796315568835c1ffa2502984884775 mhark 20210624 unpublished Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven: (0) QTRS (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 6 ms] (2) QDP (3) NonTerminationLoopProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms] (4) NO ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x, y, f(z, u, v)) -> f(f(x, y, z), u, f(x, y, v)) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: F(x, y, f(z, u, v)) -> F(f(x, y, z), u, f(x, y, v)) F(x, y, f(z, u, v)) -> F(x, y, z) F(x, y, f(z, u, v)) -> F(x, y, v) The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x, y, f(z, u, v)) -> f(f(x, y, z), u, f(x, y, v)) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (3) NonTerminationLoopProof (COMPLETE) We used the non-termination processor [FROCOS05] to show that the DP problem is infinite. Found a loop by semiunifying a rule from P directly. s = F(x, y, f(z, u, v)) evaluates to t =F(f(x, y, z), u, f(x, y, v)) Thus s starts an infinite chain as s semiunifies with t with the following substitutions: * Matcher: [x / f(x, y, z), y / u, z / x, u / y] * Semiunifier: [ ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rewriting sequence The DP semiunifies directly so there is only one rewrite step from F(x, y, f(z, u, v)) to F(f(x, y, z), u, f(x, y, v)). ---------------------------------------- (4) NO