/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


YES

After renaming modulo the bijection { r ↦ 0, e ↦ 1, w ↦ 2, i ↦ 3, t ↦ 4 },
it remains to prove termination of the 7-rule system
{ 0 1 ⟶ 2 0 ,
  3 4 ⟶ 1 0 ,
  1 2 ⟶ 0 3 ,
  4 1 ⟶ 0 1 ,
  2 0 ⟶ 3 4 ,
  1 0 ⟶ 1 2 ,
  0 3 4 1 0 ⟶ 1 2 0 3 4 1 }

The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation
of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2:

0 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 2 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

1 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 1 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

2 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 1 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

3 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

4 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 3 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 3 ↦ 3, 4 ↦ 4 },
it remains to prove termination of the 5-rule system
{ 0 1 ⟶ 2 0 ,
  3 4 ⟶ 1 0 ,
  1 2 ⟶ 0 3 ,
  2 0 ⟶ 3 4 ,
  0 3 4 1 0 ⟶ 1 2 0 3 4 1 }

Applying the dependency pairs transformation. Here, ↑ marks so-called defined symbols.

After renaming modulo the bijection { (0,↑) ↦ 0, (1,↓) ↦ 1, (2,↑) ↦ 2, (0,↓) ↦ 3, (3,↑) ↦ 4, (4,↓) ↦ 5, (1,↑) ↦ 6, (2,↓) ↦ 7, (3,↓) ↦ 8 },
it remains to prove termination of the 17-rule system
{ 0 1 ⟶ 2 3 ,
  0 1 ⟶ 0 ,
  4 5 ⟶ 6 3 ,
  4 5 ⟶ 0 ,
  6 7 ⟶ 0 8 ,
  6 7 ⟶ 4 ,
  2 3 ⟶ 4 5 ,
  0 8 5 1 3 ⟶ 6 7 3 8 5 1 ,
  0 8 5 1 3 ⟶ 2 3 8 5 1 ,
  0 8 5 1 3 ⟶ 0 8 5 1 ,
  0 8 5 1 3 ⟶ 4 5 1 ,
  0 8 5 1 3 ⟶ 6 ,
  3 1 →= 7 3 ,
  8 5 →= 1 3 ,
  1 7 →= 3 8 ,
  7 3 →= 8 5 ,
  3 8 5 1 3 →= 1 7 3 8 5 1 }

The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation
of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2:

0 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 2 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

1 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 1 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

2 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 1 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

3 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 2 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

4 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

5 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 3 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

6 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 1 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

7 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 1 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

8 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 3 ↦ 3, 4 ↦ 4, 5 ↦ 5, 6 ↦ 6, 7 ↦ 7, 8 ↦ 8 },
it remains to prove termination of the 10-rule system
{ 0 1 ⟶ 2 3 ,
  4 5 ⟶ 6 3 ,
  6 7 ⟶ 0 8 ,
  2 3 ⟶ 4 5 ,
  0 8 5 1 3 ⟶ 6 7 3 8 5 1 ,
  3 1 →= 7 3 ,
  8 5 →= 1 3 ,
  1 7 →= 3 8 ,
  7 3 →= 8 5 ,
  3 8 5 1 3 →= 1 7 3 8 5 1 }

The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation
of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 4:

0 ↦ ⎛         ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎝         ⎠

1 ↦ ⎛         ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎝         ⎠

2 ↦ ⎛         ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎝         ⎠

3 ↦ ⎛         ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎝         ⎠

4 ↦ ⎛         ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎝         ⎠

5 ↦ ⎛         ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟
    ⎝         ⎠

6 ↦ ⎛         ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎝         ⎠

7 ↦ ⎛         ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 0 1 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎝         ⎠

8 ↦ ⎛         ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 0 0 1 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟
    ⎝         ⎠

After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 3 ↦ 3, 4 ↦ 4, 5 ↦ 5, 6 ↦ 6, 7 ↦ 7, 8 ↦ 8 },
it remains to prove termination of the 8-rule system
{ 0 1 ⟶ 2 3 ,
  4 5 ⟶ 6 3 ,
  6 7 ⟶ 0 8 ,
  3 1 →= 7 3 ,
  8 5 →= 1 3 ,
  1 7 →= 3 8 ,
  7 3 →= 8 5 ,
  3 8 5 1 3 →= 1 7 3 8 5 1 }

The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation
of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2:

0 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

1 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

2 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

3 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

4 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 1 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

5 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

6 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

7 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

8 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 3 ↦ 3, 6 ↦ 4, 7 ↦ 5, 8 ↦ 6, 5 ↦ 7 },
it remains to prove termination of the 7-rule system
{ 0 1 ⟶ 2 3 ,
  4 5 ⟶ 0 6 ,
  3 1 →= 5 3 ,
  6 7 →= 1 3 ,
  1 5 →= 3 6 ,
  5 3 →= 6 7 ,
  3 6 7 1 3 →= 1 5 3 6 7 1 }

The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation
of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2:

0 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

1 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

2 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

3 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

4 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 1 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

5 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

6 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

7 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 3 ↦ 3, 5 ↦ 4, 6 ↦ 5, 7 ↦ 6 },
it remains to prove termination of the 6-rule system
{ 0 1 ⟶ 2 3 ,
  3 1 →= 4 3 ,
  5 6 →= 1 3 ,
  1 4 →= 3 5 ,
  4 3 →= 5 6 ,
  3 5 6 1 3 →= 1 4 3 5 6 1 }

The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation
of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2:

0 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 1 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

1 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

2 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

3 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

4 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

5 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

6 ↦ ⎛     ⎞
    ⎜ 1 0 ⎟
    ⎜ 0 1 ⎟
    ⎝     ⎠

After renaming modulo the bijection { 3 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 4 ↦ 2, 5 ↦ 3, 6 ↦ 4 },
it remains to prove termination of the 5-rule system
{ 0 1 →= 2 0 ,
  3 4 →= 1 0 ,
  1 2 →= 0 3 ,
  2 0 →= 3 4 ,
  0 3 4 1 0 →= 1 2 0 3 4 1 }

The system is trivially terminating.