/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NO
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: c69e44bd14796315568835c1ffa2502984884775 mhark 20210624 unpublished


Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:

(0) QTRS
(1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms]
(2) NO


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   c(b(a(b(a(x1))))) -> a(b(a(b(a(b(c(b(c(x1)))))))))

Q is empty.

----------------------------------------

(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.

Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 
"c b a b a b a b a b a b a -> a b a b a b c b a b a b a b a b a b a b c b c b a b c b c"
c b a b a b a b a b a b a -> a b a b a b c b a b a b a b a b a b a b c b c b a b c b c
by OverlapClosure OC 2"c b a b a -> a b a b a b c b c
by original rule (OC 1)""c b a b a b a b a -> a b a b a b a b a b a b c b c b a b c b c
by OverlapClosure OC 3"c b a b a b a b a -> a b a b a b c b a b a b a b c b c
by OverlapClosure OC 2"c b a b a -> a b a b a b c b c
by original rule (OC 1)""c b a b a -> a b a b a b c b c
by original rule (OC 1)"""c b a b a -> a b a b a b c b c
by original rule (OC 1)""

----------------------------------------

(2)
NO