/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES After renaming modulo the bijection { f ↦ 0, s ↦ 1, p ↦ 2, 0 ↦ 3 }, it remains to prove termination of the 3-rule system { 0 1 ⟶ 1 1 0 2 1 , 0 3 ⟶ 3 , 2 1 ⟶ } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2 }, it remains to prove termination of the 2-rule system { 0 1 ⟶ 1 1 0 2 1 , 2 1 ⟶ } The system was reversed. After renaming modulo the bijection { 1 ↦ 0, 0 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2 }, it remains to prove termination of the 2-rule system { 0 1 ⟶ 0 2 1 0 0 , 0 2 ⟶ } Applying the dependency pairs transformation. Here, ↑ marks so-called defined symbols. After renaming modulo the bijection { (0,↑) ↦ 0, (1,↓) ↦ 1, (2,↓) ↦ 2, (0,↓) ↦ 3 }, it remains to prove termination of the 5-rule system { 0 1 ⟶ 0 2 1 3 3 , 0 1 ⟶ 0 3 , 0 1 ⟶ 0 , 3 1 →= 3 2 1 3 3 , 3 2 →= } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 3 ↦ 3 }, it remains to prove termination of the 3-rule system { 0 1 ⟶ 0 2 1 3 3 , 3 1 →= 3 2 1 3 3 , 3 2 →= } Applying sparse untiling TROCU(2) after reversal [Geser/Hofbauer/Waldmann, FSCD 2019]. After renaming modulo the bijection { 1 ↦ 0, 0 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2 }, it remains to prove termination of the 2-rule system { 0 1 →= 0 2 1 0 0 , 0 2 →= } The system is trivially terminating.