/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES After renaming modulo the bijection { c ↦ 0, a ↦ 1, b ↦ 2 }, it remains to prove termination of the 3-rule system { 0 0 ⟶ 1 1 1 2 2 2 , 2 2 2 1 ⟶ 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 , 2 2 0 0 ⟶ 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 } Applying sparse tiling TRFC(2) [Geser/Hofbauer/Waldmann, FSCD 2019]. After renaming modulo the bijection { (0,0) ↦ 0, (0,1) ↦ 1, (1,1) ↦ 2, (1,2) ↦ 3, (2,2) ↦ 4, (2,0) ↦ 5, (2,1) ↦ 6, (1,0) ↦ 7, (3,0) ↦ 8, (3,1) ↦ 9, (1,4) ↦ 10, (2,4) ↦ 11, (3,2) ↦ 12 }, it remains to prove termination of the 26-rule system { 0 0 0 ⟶ 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 0 0 1 ⟶ 1 2 2 3 4 4 6 , 7 0 0 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 7 0 1 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 6 , 5 0 0 ⟶ 6 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 5 0 1 ⟶ 6 2 2 3 4 4 6 , 8 0 0 ⟶ 9 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 8 0 1 ⟶ 9 2 2 3 4 4 6 , 3 4 4 6 7 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 3 4 4 6 2 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 , 3 4 4 6 3 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 3 4 4 6 10 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 11 , 4 4 4 6 7 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 4 4 4 6 2 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 , 4 4 4 6 3 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 4 4 4 6 10 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 11 , 12 4 4 6 7 ⟶ 12 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 12 4 4 6 2 ⟶ 12 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 , 12 4 4 6 3 ⟶ 12 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 12 4 4 6 10 ⟶ 12 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 11 , 3 4 5 0 0 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 7 , 3 4 5 0 1 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 , 4 4 5 0 0 ⟶ 5 0 0 1 2 2 2 7 , 4 4 5 0 1 ⟶ 5 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 , 12 4 5 0 0 ⟶ 8 0 0 1 2 2 2 7 , 12 4 5 0 1 ⟶ 8 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 4 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 5 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 6 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 7 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 8 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 9 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 10 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 11 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 12 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 3 ↦ 3, 4 ↦ 4, 5 ↦ 5, 6 ↦ 6, 7 ↦ 7, 8 ↦ 8, 9 ↦ 9, 12 ↦ 10 }, it remains to prove termination of the 21-rule system { 0 0 0 ⟶ 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 0 0 1 ⟶ 1 2 2 3 4 4 6 , 7 0 0 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 7 0 1 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 6 , 5 0 0 ⟶ 6 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 5 0 1 ⟶ 6 2 2 3 4 4 6 , 8 0 0 ⟶ 9 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 8 0 1 ⟶ 9 2 2 3 4 4 6 , 3 4 4 6 7 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 3 4 4 6 2 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 , 3 4 4 6 3 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 4 4 4 6 7 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 4 4 4 6 2 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 , 4 4 4 6 3 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 10 4 4 6 7 ⟶ 10 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 10 4 4 6 2 ⟶ 10 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 , 10 4 4 6 3 ⟶ 10 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 3 4 5 0 0 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 7 , 3 4 5 0 1 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 , 4 4 5 0 0 ⟶ 5 0 0 1 2 2 2 7 , 4 4 5 0 1 ⟶ 5 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 4 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 5 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 6 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 7 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 8 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 9 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 10 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 3 ↦ 3, 4 ↦ 4, 5 ↦ 5, 6 ↦ 6, 7 ↦ 7, 10 ↦ 8 }, it remains to prove termination of the 19-rule system { 0 0 0 ⟶ 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 0 0 1 ⟶ 1 2 2 3 4 4 6 , 7 0 0 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 7 0 1 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 6 , 5 0 0 ⟶ 6 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 5 0 1 ⟶ 6 2 2 3 4 4 6 , 3 4 4 6 7 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 3 4 4 6 2 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 , 3 4 4 6 3 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 4 4 4 6 7 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 4 4 4 6 2 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 , 4 4 4 6 3 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 8 4 4 6 7 ⟶ 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 8 4 4 6 2 ⟶ 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 , 8 4 4 6 3 ⟶ 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 3 4 5 0 0 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 7 , 3 4 5 0 1 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 , 4 4 5 0 0 ⟶ 5 0 0 1 2 2 2 7 , 4 4 5 0 1 ⟶ 5 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 4: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 4 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 5 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 6 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 7 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 8 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 3 ↦ 3, 4 ↦ 4, 6 ↦ 5, 7 ↦ 6, 5 ↦ 7, 8 ↦ 8 }, it remains to prove termination of the 18-rule system { 0 0 1 ⟶ 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 6 0 0 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 7 , 6 0 1 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 7 0 0 ⟶ 5 2 2 3 4 4 7 , 7 0 1 ⟶ 5 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 3 4 4 5 6 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 , 3 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 3 4 4 5 3 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 4 4 4 5 6 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 , 4 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 4 4 4 5 3 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 8 4 4 5 6 ⟶ 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 , 8 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 8 4 4 5 3 ⟶ 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 3 4 7 0 0 ⟶ 6 0 0 1 2 2 2 6 , 3 4 7 0 1 ⟶ 6 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 , 4 4 7 0 0 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 6 , 4 4 7 0 1 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 6: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 4 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 5 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 6 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 7 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 8 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 3 ↦ 3, 4 ↦ 4, 5 ↦ 5, 6 ↦ 6, 7 ↦ 7, 8 ↦ 8 }, it remains to prove termination of the 17-rule system { 0 0 1 ⟶ 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 6 0 0 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 7 , 6 0 1 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 7 0 0 ⟶ 5 2 2 3 4 4 7 , 7 0 1 ⟶ 5 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 3 4 4 5 6 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 , 3 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 3 4 4 5 3 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 4 4 4 5 6 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 , 4 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 4 4 4 5 3 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 8 4 4 5 6 ⟶ 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 , 8 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 3 4 7 0 0 ⟶ 6 0 0 1 2 2 2 6 , 3 4 7 0 1 ⟶ 6 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 , 4 4 7 0 0 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 6 , 4 4 7 0 1 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 6: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 4 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 5 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 6 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 7 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 8 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 3 ↦ 3, 4 ↦ 4, 5 ↦ 5, 6 ↦ 6, 7 ↦ 7, 8 ↦ 8 }, it remains to prove termination of the 16-rule system { 0 0 1 ⟶ 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 6 0 0 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 7 , 6 0 1 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 7 0 0 ⟶ 5 2 2 3 4 4 7 , 7 0 1 ⟶ 5 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 3 4 4 5 6 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 , 3 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 3 4 4 5 3 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 4 4 4 5 6 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 , 4 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 4 4 4 5 3 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 8 4 4 5 6 ⟶ 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 , 8 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 3 4 7 0 0 ⟶ 6 0 0 1 2 2 2 6 , 4 4 7 0 0 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 6 , 4 4 7 0 1 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 6: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 4 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 5 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 6 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 7 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 8 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 3 ↦ 3, 4 ↦ 4, 5 ↦ 5, 6 ↦ 6, 7 ↦ 7, 8 ↦ 8 }, it remains to prove termination of the 15-rule system { 0 0 1 ⟶ 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 6 0 0 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 7 , 6 0 1 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 7 0 0 ⟶ 5 2 2 3 4 4 7 , 7 0 1 ⟶ 5 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 3 4 4 5 6 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 , 3 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 3 4 4 5 3 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 4 4 4 5 6 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 , 4 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 4 4 4 5 3 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 8 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 3 4 7 0 0 ⟶ 6 0 0 1 2 2 2 6 , 4 4 7 0 0 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 6 , 4 4 7 0 1 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 6: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 4 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 5 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 6 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 7 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 8 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 3 ↦ 3, 4 ↦ 4, 5 ↦ 5, 6 ↦ 6, 7 ↦ 7, 8 ↦ 8 }, it remains to prove termination of the 14-rule system { 0 0 1 ⟶ 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 6 0 0 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 7 , 6 0 1 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 7 0 0 ⟶ 5 2 2 3 4 4 7 , 7 0 1 ⟶ 5 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 3 4 4 5 6 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 , 3 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 4 4 4 5 6 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 , 4 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 4 4 4 5 3 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 8 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 3 4 7 0 0 ⟶ 6 0 0 1 2 2 2 6 , 4 4 7 0 0 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 6 , 4 4 7 0 1 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 4: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 4 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 5 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 6 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 7 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 8 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 3 ↦ 3, 4 ↦ 4, 5 ↦ 5, 6 ↦ 6, 7 ↦ 7, 8 ↦ 8 }, it remains to prove termination of the 11-rule system { 0 0 1 ⟶ 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 , 6 0 0 ⟶ 2 2 2 3 4 4 7 , 7 0 0 ⟶ 5 2 2 3 4 4 7 , 3 4 4 5 6 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 , 3 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 4 4 4 5 6 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 , 4 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 4 4 4 5 3 ⟶ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 , 8 4 4 5 2 ⟶ 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 , 3 4 7 0 0 ⟶ 6 0 0 1 2 2 2 6 , 4 4 7 0 0 ⟶ 7 0 0 1 2 2 2 6 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 4 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 5 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 6 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 7 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 8 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { 3 ↦ 0, 4 ↦ 1, 5 ↦ 2, 6 ↦ 3, 7 ↦ 4, 2 ↦ 5, 8 ↦ 6, 0 ↦ 7, 1 ↦ 8 }, it remains to prove termination of the 8-rule system { 0 1 1 2 3 ⟶ 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 , 0 1 1 2 5 ⟶ 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 , 1 1 1 2 3 ⟶ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 , 1 1 1 2 5 ⟶ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 , 1 1 1 2 0 ⟶ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 6 1 1 2 5 ⟶ 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 , 0 1 4 7 7 ⟶ 3 7 7 8 5 5 5 3 , 1 1 4 7 7 ⟶ 4 7 7 8 5 5 5 3 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 4 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 5 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 6 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 7 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 8 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 5 ↦ 3, 6 ↦ 4, 4 ↦ 5, 7 ↦ 6, 8 ↦ 7, 3 ↦ 8 }, it remains to prove termination of the 4-rule system { 0 1 1 2 3 ⟶ 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 , 1 1 1 2 3 ⟶ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 , 4 1 1 2 3 ⟶ 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 , 1 1 5 6 6 ⟶ 5 6 6 7 3 3 3 8 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 6: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 4 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 5 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 6 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 7 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 8 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { 1 ↦ 0, 2 ↦ 1, 3 ↦ 2, 4 ↦ 3, 5 ↦ 4, 6 ↦ 5, 7 ↦ 6, 8 ↦ 7 }, it remains to prove termination of the 3-rule system { 0 0 0 1 2 ⟶ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 3 0 0 1 2 ⟶ 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 4 5 5 ⟶ 4 5 5 6 2 2 2 7 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 6: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 4 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 5 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 6 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 7 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 1 ↦ 1, 2 ↦ 2, 4 ↦ 3, 5 ↦ 4, 6 ↦ 5, 7 ↦ 6 }, it remains to prove termination of the 2-rule system { 0 0 0 1 2 ⟶ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 3 4 4 ⟶ 3 4 4 5 2 2 2 6 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 6: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 1 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 1 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 4 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 5 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 6 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { 0 ↦ 0, 3 ↦ 1, 4 ↦ 2, 5 ↦ 3, 2 ↦ 4, 6 ↦ 5 }, it remains to prove termination of the 1-rule system { 0 0 1 2 2 ⟶ 1 2 2 3 4 4 4 5 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2: 0 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 1 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 3 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 4 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 5 ↦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ After renaming modulo the bijection { }, it remains to prove termination of the 0-rule system { } The system is trivially terminating.