/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


MAYBE
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: c69e44bd14796315568835c1ffa2502984884775 mhark 20210624 unpublished


Quasi decreasingness of the given CTRS could not be shown:

(0) CTRS
(1) CTRSToQTRSProof [SOUND, 0 ms]
(2) QTRS
(3) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 76 ms]
(4) QTRS
(5) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(6) QTRS
(7) AAECC Innermost [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(8) QTRS
(9) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(10) QDP
(11) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(12) QDP
(13) QReductionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(14) QDP
(15) NonTerminationLoopProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms]
(16) NO


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Conditional term rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   p(q(x)) -> 0
   c -> c

The conditional TRS C consists of the following conditional rules:

   a(x) -> b <= p(x) -> 0


----------------------------------------

(1) CTRSToQTRSProof (SOUND)
The conditional rules have been transormed into unconditional rules according to [CTRS,AAECCNOC].
----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   a(x) -> U1(p(x))
   U1(0) -> b
   p(q(x)) -> 0
   c -> c

Q is empty.

----------------------------------------

(3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT)
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

   POL(0) = 0
   POL(U1(x_1)) = 2*x_1
   POL(a(x_1)) = 1 + 2*x_1
   POL(b) = 0
   POL(c) = 0
   POL(p(x_1)) = x_1
   POL(q(x_1)) = x_1
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

   a(x) -> U1(p(x))




----------------------------------------

(4)
Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   U1(0) -> b
   p(q(x)) -> 0
   c -> c

Q is empty.

----------------------------------------

(5) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT)
Used ordering:
Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:c > q_1 > p_1 > U1_1 > b > 0

and weight map:

   0=3
   b=4
   c=1
   U1_1=1
   p_1=1
   q_1=1

The variable weight is 1With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

   U1(0) -> b
   p(q(x)) -> 0




----------------------------------------

(6)
Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   c -> c

Q is empty.

----------------------------------------

(7) AAECC Innermost (EQUIVALENT)
We have applied [NOC,AAECCNOC] to switch to innermost. The TRS R 1 is none

The TRS R 2 is 
   c -> c

The signature Sigma is {c}
----------------------------------------

(8)
Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   c -> c

The set Q consists of the following terms:

   c


----------------------------------------

(9) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
----------------------------------------

(10)
Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

   C -> C

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   c -> c

The set Q consists of the following terms:

   c

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
----------------------------------------

(11) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT)
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.
----------------------------------------

(12)
Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

   C -> C

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

   c

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
----------------------------------------

(13) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT)
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

   c


----------------------------------------

(14)
Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

   C -> C

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
----------------------------------------

(15) NonTerminationLoopProof (COMPLETE)
We used the non-termination processor [FROCOS05] to show that the DP problem is infinite.
Found a loop by semiunifying a rule from P directly.

s = C evaluates to  t =C

Thus s starts an infinite chain as s semiunifies with t with the following substitutions:
* Matcher: [ ]
* Semiunifier: [ ]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rewriting sequence

The DP semiunifies directly so there is only one rewrite step from C to C.




----------------------------------------

(16)
NO