/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


YES
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: c69e44bd14796315568835c1ffa2502984884775 mhark 20210624 unpublished


Quasi decreasingness of the given CTRS could be proven:

(0) CTRS
(1) CTRSToQTRSProof [SOUND, 0 ms]
(2) QTRS
(3) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 85 ms]
(4) QTRS
(5) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(6) QTRS
(7) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(8) QTRS
(9) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(10) YES


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Conditional term rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   a -> c
   a -> d
   b -> c
   b -> d
   c -> e
   d -> e
   k -> e
   l -> e
   s(c) -> t(k)
   s(c) -> t(l)
   s(e) -> t(e)
   g(x, x) -> h(x, x)

The conditional TRS C consists of the following conditional rules:

   f(x) -> pair(x, y) <= s(x) -> t(y)


----------------------------------------

(1) CTRSToQTRSProof (SOUND)
The conditional rules have been transormed into unconditional rules according to [CTRS,AAECCNOC].
----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   f(x) -> U1(s(x), x)
   U1(t(y), x) -> pair(x, y)
   a -> c
   a -> d
   b -> c
   b -> d
   c -> e
   d -> e
   k -> e
   l -> e
   s(c) -> t(k)
   s(c) -> t(l)
   s(e) -> t(e)
   g(x, x) -> h(x, x)

Q is empty.

----------------------------------------

(3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT)
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

   POL(U1(x_1, x_2)) = 2 + x_1 + x_2
   POL(a) = 2
   POL(b) = 1
   POL(c) = 0
   POL(d) = 1
   POL(e) = 0
   POL(f(x_1)) = 2 + 2*x_1
   POL(g(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + x_1 + 2*x_2
   POL(h(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + x_1 + x_2
   POL(k) = 0
   POL(l) = 0
   POL(pair(x_1, x_2)) = 2 + x_1 + x_2
   POL(s(x_1)) = x_1
   POL(t(x_1)) = x_1
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

   a -> c
   a -> d
   b -> c
   d -> e




----------------------------------------

(4)
Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   f(x) -> U1(s(x), x)
   U1(t(y), x) -> pair(x, y)
   b -> d
   c -> e
   k -> e
   l -> e
   s(c) -> t(k)
   s(c) -> t(l)
   s(e) -> t(e)
   g(x, x) -> h(x, x)

Q is empty.

----------------------------------------

(5) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT)
Used ordering:
Quasi precedence:
f_1 > U1_2 > pair_2
f_1 > [s_1, t_1, c] > pair_2
f_1 > [s_1, t_1, c] > k > e
f_1 > [s_1, t_1, c] > l > e
b > d
g_2 > h_2


Status:
f_1: [1]
U1_2: [2,1]
s_1: multiset status
t_1: multiset status
pair_2: multiset status
b: multiset status
d: multiset status
c: multiset status
e: multiset status
k: multiset status
l: multiset status
g_2: [2,1]
h_2: [1,2]

With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

   f(x) -> U1(s(x), x)
   U1(t(y), x) -> pair(x, y)
   b -> d
   c -> e
   k -> e
   l -> e
   s(c) -> t(k)
   s(c) -> t(l)
   g(x, x) -> h(x, x)




----------------------------------------

(6)
Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   s(e) -> t(e)

Q is empty.

----------------------------------------

(7) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT)
Used ordering:
Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:e > s_1 > t_1

and weight map:

   e=1
   s_1=1
   t_1=1

The variable weight is 1With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

   s(e) -> t(e)




----------------------------------------

(8)
Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.

----------------------------------------

(9) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT)
The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.
----------------------------------------

(10)
YES