/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: c69e44bd14796315568835c1ffa2502984884775 mhark 20210624 unpublished Termination of the given CSR could be proven: (0) CSR (1) CSRRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 41 ms] (2) CSR (3) CSRRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) CSR (5) CSRRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) CSR (7) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: g(X) -> h(X) c -> d h(d) -> g(c) The replacement map contains the following entries: g: empty set h: empty set c: empty set d: empty set ---------------------------------------- (1) CSRRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) The following CSR is given: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: g(X) -> h(X) c -> d h(d) -> g(c) The replacement map contains the following entries: g: empty set h: empty set c: empty set d: empty set Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(c) = 1 POL(d) = 0 POL(g(x_1)) = 0 POL(h(x_1)) = 0 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: c -> d ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: g(X) -> h(X) h(d) -> g(c) The replacement map contains the following entries: g: empty set h: empty set c: empty set d: empty set ---------------------------------------- (3) CSRRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) The following CSR is given: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: g(X) -> h(X) h(d) -> g(c) The replacement map contains the following entries: g: empty set h: empty set c: empty set d: empty set Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(c) = 0 POL(d) = 1 POL(g(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 POL(h(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: h(d) -> g(c) ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: g(X) -> h(X) The replacement map contains the following entries: g: empty set h: empty set ---------------------------------------- (5) CSRRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) The following CSR is given: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: g(X) -> h(X) The replacement map contains the following entries: g: empty set h: empty set Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(g(x_1)) = 1 + 2*x_1 POL(h(x_1)) = 2*x_1 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: g(X) -> h(X) ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: R is empty. ---------------------------------------- (7) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The CSR R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (8) YES