/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: c69e44bd14796315568835c1ffa2502984884775 mhark 20210624 unpublished Termination of the given CSR could be proven: (0) CSR (1) CSRRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 48 ms] (2) CSR (3) CSRRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) CSR (5) CSRRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) CSR (7) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) length(nil) -> 0 length(cons(X, Y)) -> s(length1(Y)) length1(X) -> length(X) The replacement map contains the following entries: from: {1} cons: {1} s: {1} length: empty set nil: empty set 0: empty set length1: empty set ---------------------------------------- (1) CSRRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) The following CSR is given: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) length(nil) -> 0 length(cons(X, Y)) -> s(length1(Y)) length1(X) -> length(X) The replacement map contains the following entries: from: {1} cons: {1} s: {1} length: empty set nil: empty set 0: empty set length1: empty set Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(0) = 0 POL(cons(x_1, x_2)) = x_1 POL(from(x_1)) = 1 + 2*x_1 POL(length(x_1)) = 0 POL(length1(x_1)) = 0 POL(nil) = 2 POL(s(x_1)) = 2*x_1 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: length(nil) -> 0 length(cons(X, Y)) -> s(length1(Y)) length1(X) -> length(X) The replacement map contains the following entries: cons: {1} s: {1} length: empty set nil: empty set 0: empty set length1: empty set ---------------------------------------- (3) CSRRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) The following CSR is given: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: length(nil) -> 0 length(cons(X, Y)) -> s(length1(Y)) length1(X) -> length(X) The replacement map contains the following entries: cons: {1} s: {1} length: empty set nil: empty set 0: empty set length1: empty set Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(0) = 1 POL(cons(x_1, x_2)) = 2 + x_1 + 2*x_2 POL(length(x_1)) = 1 + 2*x_1 POL(length1(x_1)) = 2 + 2*x_1 POL(nil) = 0 POL(s(x_1)) = x_1 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: length(cons(X, Y)) -> s(length1(Y)) length1(X) -> length(X) ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: length(nil) -> 0 The replacement map contains the following entries: length: empty set nil: empty set 0: empty set ---------------------------------------- (5) CSRRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) The following CSR is given: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: length(nil) -> 0 The replacement map contains the following entries: length: empty set nil: empty set 0: empty set Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(0) = 0 POL(length(x_1)) = 2 + 2*x_1 POL(nil) = 1 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: length(nil) -> 0 ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: R is empty. ---------------------------------------- (7) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The CSR R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (8) YES