/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES Problem 1: (VAR X Y Z) (STRATEGY CONTEXTSENSITIVE (add 1) (and 1) (first 1 2) (from) (if 1) (0) (cons) (false) (nil) (s) (true) ) (RULES add(0,X) -> X add(s(X),Y) -> s(add(X,Y)) and(false,Y) -> false and(true,X) -> X first(0,X) -> nil first(s(X),cons(Y,Z)) -> cons(Y,first(X,Z)) from(X) -> cons(X,from(s(X))) if(false,X,Y) -> Y if(true,X,Y) -> X ) Problem 1: Innermost Equivalent Processor: -> Rules: add(0,X) -> X add(s(X),Y) -> s(add(X,Y)) and(false,Y) -> false and(true,X) -> X first(0,X) -> nil first(s(X),cons(Y,Z)) -> cons(Y,first(X,Z)) from(X) -> cons(X,from(s(X))) if(false,X,Y) -> Y if(true,X,Y) -> X -> The context-sensitive term rewriting system is an orthogonal system. Therefore, innermost cs-termination implies cs-termination. Problem 1: Dependency Pairs Processor: -> Pairs: ADD(0,X) -> X AND(true,X) -> X IF(false,X,Y) -> Y IF(true,X,Y) -> X -> Rules: add(0,X) -> X add(s(X),Y) -> s(add(X,Y)) and(false,Y) -> false and(true,X) -> X first(0,X) -> nil first(s(X),cons(Y,Z)) -> cons(Y,first(X,Z)) from(X) -> cons(X,from(s(X))) if(false,X,Y) -> Y if(true,X,Y) -> X -> Unhiding Rules: add(X,Y) -> ADD(X,Y) add(x3,Y) -> x3 first(X,Z) -> FIRST(X,Z) first(X,x3) -> x3 first(x3,Z) -> x3 from(s(X)) -> FROM(s(X)) Problem 1: Basic Processor: -> Pairs: ADD(0,X) -> X AND(true,X) -> X IF(false,X,Y) -> Y IF(true,X,Y) -> X -> Rules: add(0,X) -> X add(s(X),Y) -> s(add(X,Y)) and(false,Y) -> false and(true,X) -> X first(0,X) -> nil first(s(X),cons(Y,Z)) -> cons(Y,first(X,Z)) from(X) -> cons(X,from(s(X))) if(false,X,Y) -> Y if(true,X,Y) -> X -> Unhiding rules: add(X,Y) -> ADD(X,Y) add(x3,Y) -> x3 first(X,Z) -> FIRST(X,Z) first(X,x3) -> x3 first(x3,Z) -> x3 from(s(X)) -> FROM(s(X)) -> Result: All pairs P are from Px1 The problem is finite.