details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	kabasci03.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n180.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	AProVE_07

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	2.62336 seconds
cpu usage	6.97797
user time	6.6799
system time	0.298068
max virtual memory	1.8424988E7
max residence set size	423216.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	YES

output

YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 27 ms] (2) QDP (3) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) QDP (5) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) QDP (7) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 76 ms] (8) QDP (9) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: h(c(x, y), c(s(z), z), t(w)) -> h(z, c(y, x), t(t(c(x, c(y, t(w)))))) h(x, c(y, z), t(w)) -> h(c(s(y), x), z, t(c(t(w), w))) h(c(s(x), c(s(0), y)), z, t(x)) -> h(y, c(s(0), c(x, z)), t(t(c(x, s(x))))) t(t(x)) -> t(c(t(x), x)) t(x) -> x t(x) -> c(0, c(0, c(0, c(0, c(0, x))))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: H(c(x, y), c(s(z), z), t(w)) -> H(z, c(y, x), t(t(c(x, c(y, t(w)))))) H(c(x, y), c(s(z), z), t(w)) -> T(t(c(x, c(y, t(w))))) H(c(x, y), c(s(z), z), t(w)) -> T(c(x, c(y, t(w)))) H(x, c(y, z), t(w)) -> H(c(s(y), x), z, t(c(t(w), w))) H(x, c(y, z), t(w)) -> T(c(t(w), w)) H(c(s(x), c(s(0), y)), z, t(x)) -> H(y, c(s(0), c(x, z)), t(t(c(x, s(x))))) H(c(s(x), c(s(0), y)), z, t(x)) -> T(t(c(x, s(x)))) H(c(s(x), c(s(0), y)), z, t(x)) -> T(c(x, s(x))) T(t(x)) -> T(c(t(x), x)) The TRS R consists of the following rules: h(c(x, y), c(s(z), z), t(w)) -> h(z, c(y, x), t(t(c(x, c(y, t(w)))))) h(x, c(y, z), t(w)) -> h(c(s(y), x), z, t(c(t(w), w))) h(c(s(x), c(s(0), y)), z, t(x)) -> h(y, c(s(0), c(x, z)), t(t(c(x, s(x))))) t(t(x)) -> t(c(t(x), x)) t(x) -> x t(x) -> c(0, c(0, c(0, c(0, c(0, x))))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 6 less nodes. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: H(x, c(y, z), t(w)) -> H(c(s(y), x), z, t(c(t(w), w))) H(c(x, y), c(s(z), z), t(w)) -> H(z, c(y, x), t(t(c(x, c(y, t(w)))))) H(c(s(x), c(s(0), y)), z, t(x)) -> H(y, c(s(0), c(x, z)), t(t(c(x, s(x))))) The TRS R consists of the following rules: h(c(x, y), c(s(z), z), t(w)) -> h(z, c(y, x), t(t(c(x, c(y, t(w)))))) h(x, c(y, z), t(w)) -> h(c(s(y), x), z, t(c(t(w), w))) h(c(s(x), c(s(0), y)), z, t(x)) -> h(y, c(s(0), c(x, z)), t(t(c(x, s(x))))) t(t(x)) -> t(c(t(x), x)) t(x) -> x t(x) -> c(0, c(0, c(0, c(0, c(0, x))))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to TRS Standard