Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost pair #487108484

details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	Ex3_3_25_Bor03_C.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n142.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	292.854 seconds
cpu usage	1144.74
user time	1131.75
system time	12.9911
max virtual memory	3.7510452E7
max residence set size	1.5044028E7

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?)

output

WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?)
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty


The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) DCpxTrs
(1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
(2) CpxRelTRS
(3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 397 ms]
(4) CpxRelTRS
(5) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
(6) CpxRelTRS
(7) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 11 ms]
(8) typed CpxTrs
(9) OrderProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
(10) typed CpxTrs
(11) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 467 ms]
(12) BEST
    (13) proven lower bound
        (14) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms]
        (15) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)
    (16) typed CpxTrs
        (17) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 157 ms]
        (18) typed CpxTrs
        (19) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 112 ms]
        (20) typed CpxTrs
        (21) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 103 ms]
        (22) typed CpxTrs
        (23) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 143 ms]
        (24) typed CpxTrs
        (25) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 83 ms]
        (26) typed CpxTrs
        (27) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 1039 ms]
        (28) BOUNDS(1, INF)


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   active(app(nil, YS)) -> mark(YS)
   active(app(cons(X, XS), YS)) -> mark(cons(X, app(XS, YS)))
   active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
   active(zWadr(nil, YS)) -> mark(nil)
   active(zWadr(XS, nil)) -> mark(nil)
   active(zWadr(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) -> mark(cons(app(Y, cons(X, nil)), zWadr(XS, YS)))
   active(prefix(L)) -> mark(cons(nil, zWadr(L, prefix(L))))
   active(app(X1, X2)) -> app(active(X1), X2)
   active(app(X1, X2)) -> app(X1, active(X2))
   active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
   active(from(X)) -> from(active(X))
   active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
   active(zWadr(X1, X2)) -> zWadr(active(X1), X2)
   active(zWadr(X1, X2)) -> zWadr(X1, active(X2))
   active(prefix(X)) -> prefix(active(X))
   app(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(app(X1, X2))
   app(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(app(X1, X2))
   cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
   from(mark(X)) -> mark(from(X))
   s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
   zWadr(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(zWadr(X1, X2))
   zWadr(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(zWadr(X1, X2))
   prefix(mark(X)) -> mark(prefix(X))
   proper(app(X1, X2)) -> app(proper(X1), proper(X2))
   proper(nil) -> ok(nil)
   proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
   proper(from(X)) -> from(proper(X))
   proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
   proper(zWadr(X1, X2)) -> zWadr(proper(X1), proper(X2))
   proper(prefix(X)) -> prefix(proper(X))
   app(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(app(X1, X2))
   cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
   from(ok(X)) -> ok(from(X))
   s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
   zWadr(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(zWadr(X1, X2))
   prefix(ok(X)) -> ok(prefix(X))
   top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
   top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem:

   encArg(nil) -> nil
   encArg(mark(x_1)) -> mark(encArg(x_1))
   encArg(ok(x_1)) -> ok(encArg(x_1))
   encArg(cons_active(x_1)) -> active(encArg(x_1))
   encArg(cons_app(x_1, x_2)) -> app(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2))
   encArg(cons_cons(x_1, x_2)) -> cons(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2))
   encArg(cons_from(x_1)) -> from(encArg(x_1))

popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost